Humanitarian Genetic Diversity
Originally published:
We need to extract money out of a tax base to pay reparations, according to CRT. So, using DNA from ethnic Northwestern European anti-racist volunteers, those volunteers should (WITH ARTIFICIAL WOMBS) mass reproduce designer recessive babies, according to a recessive genetic correlation. Then the designer recessive babies, once grown, can pay reparations to the people of color.
To mitigate risks, mass automated reproduction of recessive individuals, who later pay reparations, shall come before voluntary distribution of recessive privileges.
Replacing eugenics, could genetically engineered mutations(somatic and germinal) to give recessive traits, humanely supplement natural selection?
“WARNING: GENETIC ENGINEERING IS DANGEROUS. Maybe genetic diversity does not always connect with both dominant traits and dominant genes. Potentially, and possibly, a genetically engineered somatic mutation could automatically give people recessive traits. Potentially a genetically engineered germinal mutation could automatically give people recessive genes. Mutations may actually add genetic diversity, so long as human individuals are NOT removed from the gene pool. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383114924_EIP_then_RPD”(Ohnemus 2024).
Works Cited
Ohnemus , Alexander . “ "AARRR"ANTI-Racist Anthology: Reparations PAID by Recessive Reproduction.” ResearchGate.net , Ohnemus University , 29 Aug. 2024, www.researchgate.net/publication/383524095_AARRRANTI-racist_Anthology_Reparations_PAID_BY_Recessive_Reproduction. Accessed 8 Sept. 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10105.89444. “ Maybe humans, through mass automation, COULD mass reproduce fellow homo sapiens with recessive alleles(such as ANTI-racism, liberalism, democracy, progressivism, creativity, intelligence and the other recessive traits and genes minus the diseases), without cloning per se. Epigenetic information polish could remove recessive diseases. Aiming for the recessive would also mitigate a phenotypic revolution. Recessive ≠ useful to machines.” “Artificial wombs(robots birthing humans) may still mitigate phenotypic revolutions, so long as the machine itself doesn’t reproduce and only human DNA does. Plus, maybe one could create a human egg from human somatic cells. The issues will hopefully work out.””
Ohnemus , Alexander . “Do Mutations Add or Subtract Genetic Diversity? How?” ResearchGate.net , Ohnemus University , 6 Sept. 2024, www.researchgate.net/publication/383819387_Do_mutations_add_or_subtract_genetic_diversity_How?channel=doi&linkId=66db0aeef84dd1716cd23ec0&showFulltext=true. dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34321.44645 . Accessed 7 Sept. 2024. “ WARNING: GENETIC ENGINEERING IS DANGEROUS. Maybe genetic diversity does not always connect with both dominant traits and dominant genes. Potentially, and possibly, a genetically engineered somatic mutation could automatically give people recessive traits. Potentially a genetically engineered germinal mutation could automatically give people recessive genes. Mutations may actually add genetic diversity, so long as human individuals are NOT removed from the gene pool. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383114924_EIP_then_RPD .”
Loewe, Dr. Laurence. “Genetic Mutation. .” Nature.com, Nature, 2008, www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/genetic-mutation-1127. Accessed 7 Sept. 2024. “ Genetic mutation is the basis of species diversity among beetles, or any other organism. Mutations are changes in the genetic sequence, and they are a main cause of diversity among organisms. These changes occur at many different levels, and they can have widely differing consequences.”
Fraser, Christophe et al. “The bacterial species challenge: making sense of genetic and ecological diversity.” Science (New York, N.Y.) vol. 323,5915 (2009): 741-6. doi:10.1126/science.1159388. “The Bacteria and Archaea are the most genetically diverse superkingdoms of life, and techniques for exploring that diversity are only just becoming widespread.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19197054/.
Bush, Vannevar. “Prokaryotes: Bacteria, Archaea, and Early Life on Earth.” Gatech.edu, Geogria Tech Biological Sciences, organismalbio.biosci.gatech.edu/biodiversity/prokaryotes-bacteria-archaea-2/. Accessed 8 Sept. 2024. “ The fossil record indicates that the first living organisms were prokaryotes (Bacteria and Archaea), and eukaryotes arose a billion years later. The Earth is approximately 4.6 billion years old based on radiometric dating.”